Authored an 11,000-word research paper synthesising a year of independent work, offering a comprehensive comparative analysis of Indian and international cybersquatting laws, and addressing a notable gap in existing comparative legal literature. Defined cybersquatting as the bad-faith registration or use of domain names to exploit established trademarks.

Examined India’s legal framework under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and IT Act, 2000, referencing landmark cases like Satyam Infoway v. Sifynet Solutions and Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora, and evaluating remedies such as injunctions, damages, and domain transfers.

Compared Indian law with international frameworks under UDRP and TRIPS, highlighting cross-border dispute resolution, enforcement challenges, and preventive strategies for businesses.